![]() Romano claimed that his damages were irreparable because he will be fired, lose prestige and seniority, have his reputation marred, and suffer “spiritual distress” should the court deny his motion. The court noted that a plaintiff suffers irreparable harm from the denial of a preliminary injunction if the harm is not fully compensable by monetary damages. Romano’s irreparable injury must be both certain and immediate, not speculative or theoretical. As the moving party, the court held that Mr. Romano’s motion because he failed to show immediate and irreparable harm. In a concise opinion, the court denied Mr. Romano filed his lawsuit in December 2021-before the potential termination date-and sought a preliminary and permanent injunction preventing his termination, on grounds that BCBSM’s COVID-19 vaccine policy violates federal and state civil rights laws, as well as the U.S. Romano claimed that he had been improperly denied such an exemption. BCBSM indeed enforces a policy requiring its employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine or face consequences, and although the policy allows for certain religious exemptions, Mr. Romano, alleged that he was set to be fired on Januif he did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine, despite his religious objection to receiving it. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, the employee, Mr. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan denied an employee’s motion for a preliminary injunction, asking the court to prevent his employer, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM), from terminating his employment due to his refusal to receive a COVID-19 vaccine based on religious grounds. ![]() Specifically, on January 3, 2022, the U.S. Public Services, Infrastructure, TransportationĪ recent court decision bolstered the position of employers who take a strict position on enforcing COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |